What Meta and McKinsey’s AI Reset Means for NZ Tech Hiring

December 16, 2025

Over the past few weeks, two very different global organisations have made headlines for similar reasons.

Meta has doubled down on AI, reshaping teams, tightening performance expectations, and making deliberate cuts in areas that no longer align to its future direction.
McKinsey, a firm built on advising others through change, has also announced significant restructuring as AI alters how work is done and where value is created.

On the surface, these stories read like more bad news: layoffs, pressure, uncertainty.

But for those of us watching the talent market closely, they signal something more important: the shift from cost-cutting to capability-building is well underway.

And that has real implications for how NZ tech leaders should be thinking about hiring in 2025 and beyond.

This Isn’t About AI Replacing People

It’s tempting to frame these changes as “AI taking jobs”. That makes for a neat headline, but it misses the point.

What Meta and McKinsey are actually doing is re-architecting work:

  • Removing roles that were built for yesterday’s operating models
  • Compressing layers of decision-making
  • Expecting higher judgement, adaptability, and ownership from fewer people

AI is the catalyst, but strategy is the driver.

The work still exists. In many cases, it’s becoming more complex, not less.

The Signal Hidden in the Noise

Here’s the part that often gets overlooked.

While these organisations are cutting in some areas, they are actively investing in others:

  • AI product leadership
  • Platform, data, and security capability
  • Roles that sit between technology, people, and decision-making

This isn’t a hiring freeze. It’s selective, intentional hiring.

And that pattern is starting to quietly show up in New Zealand as well.

What We’re Seeing Locally

In the Auckland and Wellington markets, the shift looks like this:

  • Fewer “nice to have” hires
  • Fewer roles with vague outcomes
  • More scrutiny on impact, not tenure or pedigree
  • Increased demand for people who can operate across ambiguity

We’re seeing clients pause roles not because they don’t need people, but because they’re redefining what ‘good’ looks like.

That’s a very different problem to solve.

Why This Matters for NZ Tech Leaders

The biggest risk right now isn’t hiring too slowly.
It’s hiring for yesterday’s org chart.

Global firms are sending a clear message:
Roles that exist purely to pass information, manage process, or sit between decisions are under pressure.

Roles that:

  • translate strategy into action
  • make good decisions with imperfect information
  • combine technical literacy with commercial judgement

Those roles are becoming more valuable, not less.

A Different Hiring Conversation

This is where recruitment either adds value or becomes noise.

Posting a job ad and hoping the right CV appears is no longer enough, especially when application volumes are high but signal quality is low.

The real work now happens upstream:

  • pressure-testing whether a role is future-fit
  • understanding what outcomes actually matter
  • mapping talent that may not look “obvious” on paper

That’s the difference between reacting to the market and shaping through it.

Meta and McKinsey aren’t cautionary tales. They’re early indicators.

They show us what happens when organisations stop asking “Who can we afford to hire?” and start asking “Who do we need to become?”

NZ tech companies that take that question seriously now will be the ones best positioned when confidence, investment, and growth properly return.

Return to Blogs